President Donald Trump once said famously that he could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot someone and not lose any voters, and that may be true.
However, it’s becoming crystal clear that the same may not be true when it comes to implementing massive tariffs that many prominent economists and financial leaders say will break the world’s economy and send the US into a recession or depression.
To get an idea of how much the stock market hates the notion of the universal tariffs, on Wednesday, April 9, when Trump announced a 90-day pause on many tariffs with the exception of China, the stock market shot up like a rocket. Before that, the markets had cratered day after day and the pressure was growing and growing on Trump and Congress to do something. Many had jumped off the Trump train by that point, and apparently, the harsh reaction to the plan has even caused the president to put the brakes on the tariff train, at least for now.
Last week, there were enough US senators to approve a resolution that would stop Trump’s tariff policy – which places large tariffs on just about every country in the world with the exceptions of Russia, North Korea and Belarus. Though that resolution will not pass in the House of Representatives, it was the first real break by the Senate from Trump since he was elected.
The tariff plan is meant to bring manufacturing jobs back to the United States by making goods from other countries too expensive to purchase in America. Trump says Americans will have to endure some pain – such as big losses in their 401k – however, Trump has been saying he remains optimistic that, on the other side of all this pain, America will one day enter a golden age.
But the tariff policy hasn’t gone over well with most Americans, financial experts and, interestingly, lately, even some MAGA Republicans.
Trump’s partner in governing – Elon Musk – is one MAGA mogul who’s 100 percent against the move. The “world’s smartest man” called Trump’s top trade adviser Peter Navaro a “moron” and said he was “dumber than a sack of bricks.” Musk then later apologized to all bricks for associating them with Navaro. Musk also said, among other things, that there should be no tariffs between America and Europe.
Musk is not alone in his hatred of the tariffs.
While some of Trump’s team are highly supportive of the plan, an increasing number of Republican and conservative leaders and right-wing influencers say the president’s tariff plan is a bridge too far.
When North Carolina Republican Senator Thom Tillis was told North Carolina farmers would have to endure a period of pain for a while, he responded hotly.
“We need to talk about farmers who are one crop away from bankruptcy,” the senator said. “They don’t have time, so we’ve got to be crisp on this implementation. Otherwise, we could do damage that’s irreparable to farmers.”
Dave Portnoy, a conservative podcaster, business owner, and strong Trump supporter who runs Barstool Sports, ranted, “I’m down seven million bucks and stocks and crypto. If this is Biden, and he did some sort of scheme like this …and he absolutely tanked the stock market, he would be getting crucified. And in front of the line would be Trump.”
Right-wing Trump supporter Ben Shapiro said Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs were “probably unconstitutional.”
Shapiro added: “Trump’s reciprocal tariffs imposed hundreds of billions of dollars in new taxes on Americans will be the largest tax increase since the Revenue Act of 1968, one of the biggest tax increases on American consumers in the history of America, and it’s going to cost American consumers. It will cost American producers who use inputs from other countries. The Dow Jones industrial average plummeted immediately more than 1,000 points; the S&P 500 plummeted more than 3 percent, while the NASDAQ plummeted almost 4 1/2 percent. There are real world implications for this sort of stuff. Trade wars are in fact not good and not easy to win, particularly if you don’t actually have a plan. It is predicated on a bad idea of how international trade works – a fundamental misunderstanding of trade deficits. Trade deficits are an accounting procedure. Trade deficits have pretty much nothing to do with the health of an economy. I can name you a period in American history where there was a fairly large surplus in America’s balance of trade – the entire Great Depression.”
A host of economists around the world have almost universally assailed the tariff plans that the Economist magazine called “bonkers.”
While the policy is causing havoc, Trump’s April 9 temporary pause of his grand plan to bring manufacturing back to America is being very well received by investors, many people on Main Street and countries around the world.
When a journal gets a new owner, the future course of the journal is inevitably more precarious than it was before. When it gets a new owner AND a new Editor, the risk is multiplied exponentially.
Scott Yost is the new owner and Editor.
Both of his latest Headline Stories have been very critical of the President – despite this being basically a local organ,
and the history and readership of The Rhino being steeped in conservatism.
This is a risky strategy. History is littered with the corpses of long forgotten newspapers and magazines that decided to “enlighten” their readers.
Fools rush in where angels fear to tread. Good luck, Scott.
Austin, I appreciate your input, but it is not un-conservative to question whether any administration should, in violation of a court order, take an unconvicted person, imprison them in a brutal jail in a foreign country with no due process, and then admit it was done so in error, and THEN, against another judge’s order, despite admitting it was your mistake, move hell and high water to keep this person in that hellscape just so you don’t have to admit that you got it wrong. That is absolutely indefensible no matter what side you are on. If Biden had done it, your hair would be on fire. Also,the Rhino Times has written about national issues for decades. As for the massive tariff plan, a vast majority of conservatives in the country believe it to be badly misguided.
I agree with your reasoning regarding the content matter of the articles. I’m not a knee jerk Republican. But I fear it will be the tone of such pieces that will, if continued, alienate the readership. People are not logical. The conservative readers of this organ share an enthusiastic and fervent support of it, but if it becomes continually and chronically critical of their unabashedly right wing President, that affection will dissipate and they’ll just wander off.
That’s what I’m afraid of. That’s all.
I want The Rhino to survive and thrive.
I am a Rhino reader who also wants it to survive, but I do not think it will by supporting bad policies or ideas, which I do not think is even conservative. Scott’s articles have been thoughtful and based upon sound conservative reasoning. I found them enlightening compared to some of the quackery from the sycophant claque in Washington and I much prefer thoughtful deliberation from a local observer to narratives fashioned to move national news. Good job Scott! Keep up the good work!
Thank you Frank. I appreciate that.
Well I don’t think it’s the role of The Rhino to be supporting any particular policy, or decrying one. This does purport to be a newspaper, after all.
John Hammer was capable of overtly taking policy positions, but he always clearly classified them as “Opinion”. I checked the last “Opinion” piece in The Rhino, and it was over a year ago, and written by John Hammer. Scott is blurring the distinction between reporting and opinion, and that’s never a good thing.
And for myself, I actually enjoy stirring it up. I just don’t know how beneficial it will be for the paper if Scott consistently espouses anti-Trump positions, especially when they’re clumsily presented as news.
Austin, this article was just an article about what was happening. I wasn’t taking sides and it wasn’t my opinion. Conservative leaders including huge Trump donors and MAGA influencers were publicaly opposed to the policy in droves.
Point taken, Scott. I woke up this morning feeling that I was wrong about this. But my concerns were for the wellbeing of The Rhino, that’s all. I still think it’s dangerous to risk alienating the core readership, but I’d actually prefer a bit of cage rattling if it were up to me.
What is the old salesman saying about pricing…? Make them gasp at your first price and negotiate from there.
Not saying that is what is happening, but the action has caused a lot of them to come to the table to…negotiate?
Is this the steps of making a deal?
So, Scott, you sincerely believe that the reason the authorities are keeping the illegal in the Salvadorian prison is because they don’t want to admit someone was wrong? Really? A mistake was admitted. That is an admission of being wrong. Regarding tariffs, the vast majority of conservatives, as well as liberals, have no idea what a tariff is. As I have mentioned previously, the War Between the States started over tariffs. I hope that those who believe the War was over slavery will take the time to review the history of the Tariff of 1828. I trust Trump and his team’s judgment in 2025. I would have been in solidarity with the South in 1828.
Only those on the extreme end of their party believe that any criticism of the actions of their party is inappropriate. Guess the ‘think for yourself crowd’ doesn’t like it when people actually think for themselves. Not shocked as it is just another example of hypocrisy in politics from the far right.
Chris has completely misunderstood my comment.
not really….you clearly think conservative don’t support any critical feedback on Trump. Kinda like a cult.
No I do not think that.
And my party, if I have one, is the Libertarian Party, not the GOP.
What’s funny is the same shared characteristics of religious zealots, monarchist and far right fascist… Blind allegience to a leader or idealogy no matter what the cost and rooted in hatred of the other.
Scott is an honorable man. You should be grateful he is a rational conservative focused on truth no matter where the chips fall.
It’s what makes the Rhino great. Hammer was the same and while I don’t always agree with Scott, you know his point is well thought out and well written and worth considering.
Nobody’s impugning his honor! And my remarks expressed a concern for the survival of this paper, without addressing the merits of the content of column.
You won’t find anybody more pro-Fourth Estate than me – which is why I want this organ to survive.
I hope you’re able to appreciate the distinction.
So to be clear. Your belief is Scott shouldn’t write articles critical of Trump? Because it will hurt the feeling so his zealots like Alan Marshall and other foxnews fans? Which is to say, he should not be honest about what he considers important to his readers for fear of a few?\
Isn’t that how we got such polarized news channels on cable tv these days?
No, that’s not it at all. You’re obviously not bright enough to discern fine distinctions in reasoning.
And you love putting words in other people’s mouths. But we all knew that.
Yet again Austin hates being held accountable to his words. Lmao.
You were clearly critical of this ariticle being in the rhino. We fully understand the cult of Trump are a bunch of snowflakes.
But you be you.
“The Ballad of the Tariff Train (Now Paused for Repairs)”
Old Donnie stood on Fifth one day,
Said, “I could shoot and walk away!”
But when he taxed the world’s fine goods—
The Dow dove deep into the woods.
He pitched a plan, all red, white, bold:
“Let’s make our widgets here! (In gold!)
Just slap a tariff on Japan,
And watch jobs bloom in Michigan.”
But lo! The stocks began to quake,
Retirees clutched TUMS and steak.
The markets, once so MAGA proud,
Now sounded like a crying crowd.
Elon Musk, that Twitter knight,
Declared the plan “a plague, not right!”
He called poor Peter Navar-O
“Dumber than bricks”—a moral blow.
(He later said, with sober fix:
“My bad, that’s harsh… to all the bricks.”)
Ben Shapiro, sharp and fast,
Said, “Tariff math won’t ever last.
They’re just new taxes, Trump my friend,
And not the kind that helps you spend.”
And Tillis down in Carolina
Said, “My state’s broke—ain’t no reminder.
One more crop fails, they’re out for good,
You can’t eat tweets or campaign wood.”
Then Barstool Dave, in full lament,
Said, “Seven mil I just have spent!
Crypto, stocks—all hit the floor,
I’m MAGA, but not broke no more.”
So Don, with polls in slow decline,
Hit pause, announced, “I’m feelin’ fine!
We’ll take a break—except for China,
Who stole our ketchup and our Heineken.”
The world exhaled a great phew sigh,
The S&P began to fly.
But skeptics warned, “This break’s just bait—
The train might roll at a later date.”
So here we sit, the tariffs stalled,
As bricks and farmers, both appalled,
Watch Donnie hold a tinfoil crown
While markets beg: “Please, shut it down!”
Funny he didn’t mention destroying peoples 401ks, farmers livelihoods, ALL of our world trading relationships, etc… when running for office. Amazing how the fools still believed he actually knew what he was doing. He didn’t, he doesn’t, and he never will. He is a long-time failed businessman who finally found growth in his inherited wealth via fame versus actual business success. And the fools followed. What an embarrassment.
And note that we have a large trade imbalance with the world BECAUSE we had the strongest economy in the world. Sure, there are opportunities to tune things up with a tweak there or a pinch here…. but a full abandonment of the global trade system WE helped build can only be thought up by a fool like Trump and his supporters.
But you be you.
I am a financially conservative person and this tariff stuff is like driving off a cliff and wondering where the road went.
God Bless America and her battered people.
Trump continues to make the pundits look really stupid. He’s at least five steps ahead of them all the time.
Yeah right, he is stumbling ahead in the dark with no idea where he is going. The risk to the bond market is now higher than it has ever been and given our massive debt load, we need a balance to the budget or risk rapid interest rates increases to fund just the interest payments. No way Trump will address this issue. Yet again, a democrat will inherit a failed economy from a republican.
I’ll bet on Trump and America. Not China.
China has zero issues letting it people suffer. Seems Trump is of the same mind. It’s a game of chicken as to which leader can care less about the people of their country. Trump has already blinked several times with other countries (thankfully), I bet he blinks with China too. Especially if you watched the value of the dollar and treasuries last night.
I hear the bond markets were selling off. That’s the first sign of recession. Also 401K’s and Stocks sinking faster than the Titanic made trump give in. Lers see what happens next..
Most of these comments have not aged well. I am a fiscal conservative & I back the tariff moves the President has made. The bad trade deals of the past 50 years along with rampant waste & fraud have given us a 36 TRILLION dollar debt. We had to chart a new course or face the end of America as a superpower. We now have the ability to refinance our debt at a lower rate, have countries from all over the world scrambling to negotiate fair trade with us & have isolated China. We are eliminating obvious waste & fraud. American manufacturing is about to grow in leaps & bounds. God bless America & our President who has been bold enough to set this all in motion.
No question the debt is a significant issue and the trade gap plays a big role in that. But universal tariffs and cutting off trading partners won’t solve our problem without major long-term impacts to our economy.
We need real leadeship with a well thought out approach that targets the biggest abusers without starting a massive global trade war. Trump clearly lacks the skills to do so and his nuclear approach is a sizable failure (hence his pause) and even his smaller universal tariffs are likely to push us into a recession.
To also be clear, if Trump cared about the national debt (he doesn’t as he is fine with bankruptcy) why hey yet again increasing our national debt? We need revenue reform as much as spending reform. The decades of tax cuts have left us buried in debt and have never delivered the long-term benefit promised by conservatives dating back to Reagan. In case you don’t understand, global trade warfare will hurt revenue far more than it will reduce the trade deficit.
We need a real leader. Not a totalitarian bully who thinks he knows all yet knows nothing.
** After 4 years of a feeble mentally deficient octogenarian in the White House, we finally DO have a real leader.
Fact.
You mean the old orange man who can’t maintain a single train of thought while speaking any more.
For example: The World Series champions, the Los Angeles Dodgers, went to visit the White House. So Trump says ““This year, the Dodgers faced down adversity. You entered the play-offs battered and bruised but not broken,” (and then …. off he goes) “When you ran out the health arms. You ran out of really healthy, they had great arms. But they ran out. It’s called sports, it’s called baseball in particular. And pitchers, I guess you could say in really particular.”
LMAO. This is YOUR hero. To me he is an old fool whose ego is going to destroy the US and everything that makes us Great. An yes, that includes far more than just his awful approach to using tariffs.
But you be you.
We are at war with China and need wartime leadership. I thank God every day we have it. MAGA
Sooooo shooting ourselves in the foot is more a draft dodger strategy…oh wait.
The naysayers don’t understand what Trump is doing. He is trying to usher in a new era of free trade across the globe. Yes, you read that right. All the years of smooching and schmoozing with foreign countries has accomplished nothing at in in terms of reduced trade barriers. But within days of the tariffs Israel and Vietnam both volunteered that they would abolish their import tariffs on American goods if the US would do the same for their goods.
Voila !
Playing hardball gets results.
It’s like the Western middle class mammas of the 80’s who’d ring their hands and tremble in fear as Reagan installed Cruise Missiles in Eastern Europe, and built up our military. The whole point of all that was to ensure the USSR didn’t start WW III and, if possible, squeeze their economy so much that it would lead to the collapse of the communist regime – without firing a shot. Reagan wasn’t arming up because he wanted war. He was arming up because he wanted peace. And it worked beautifully.
Trump isn’t imposing tariffs because he wants protectionism. He’s doing it because he wants free trade.
He’s shrewd, cunning, highly intelligent and he understands power dynamics.
Most everybody is misunderstanding what’s going on.
LOL free trade by alienating your largest trading partners by bulling them over the top universal tariffs? After Trump is done with them, the only freedom they will have if finding new trading partners.
Good luck with that strategy. No one in the market believes in it and now we are at risk of being able to issue bonds at current rates to sustain our decades of overspending and under collection of taxes. Welcome recession and inflation. Idiots.
How long has this guy Chris been a rude, obnoxious jerk?
And a moron?
al hare
Are you sure you want to speak ill of one with such a prestigious and overwhelming education record as Chris? Just ask him then open a beer and watch grass grow.That;s far more interesting and educational.
Another fine example if where my temperament comes from…just returning in kind.
Cracks me up that sharing facts, data and analysis from experts upset conservatives in their pursuit of hate, misinformation, and lies. Happy to help the cause with a little fact checking and return of the rude insulting comments I receive in turn. Kinda my morning hobby with coffee.
But you be you. I really am not bothered by your childish insults. LMAO
Ever since I was treated rudely here for having more liberal views and questioning the lies and misinformation that the conservative movement is so famous for these days.
You are a great example of your own complaint. Classic conservative hypocrisy.
But you be you.
Al Do you know what an ad hominem response is?
Yes. He deserves it.
The classic conserstive response when faced with facts or data that counters their biased point of view.
What facts and data are those?
That’s a perceptive analysis. Trump is upping the ante so as to bring about MORE free trade, and it’s already producing results.
Trump knows how to negotiate.
Biden didn’t know how to walk off a stage.
Republicans are worried about losing seats at the mid-terms, and rightly so. The apathetic and mis/uninformed voters will fix on any rhetoric they favor. Three months is not the time to make any judgements. Judgement time is Nov ’26.
I don’t know. Trump came out swinging for the stupid fence pretty quick this go round.